AVS 66 Session TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA: ALD and CVD: Nucleation, Surface Reactions, Mechanisms, and Kinetics

Monday, October 21, 2019 1:40 PM in Room A124-125
Monday Afternoon

Session Abstract Book
(312KB, Apr 26, 2020)
Time Period MoA Sessions | Abstract Timeline | Topic TF Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | AVS 66 Schedule

Start Invited? Item
1:40 PM Invited TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-1 ALD on Particles: What is Different from Wafers?
Ruud van Ommen (Delft University of Technology, Netherlands)

Advanced materials, often relying on nanostructured particles as building blocks, are crucial in meeting grand challenges in energy and health. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is an excellent technique to make such nanostructured particles: particles of which the surface is either covered by an ultrathin film or by nanoclusters. Although the underlying mechanisms are similar, there are quite some differences between ALD processing of wafers and ALD processing of particles. This presentation will discuss recent developments and insights in the field of applying ALD to particles, with an emphasis on reactor technology, precursor utilization, operating conditions, and scaling up. I will show that ALD is suited to produce nanostructured particles with very high precision. Moreover, it is scalable such that large amounts of such particles can be produced.

2:20 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-3 Insights into Particle ALD Peculiarities from In- and Ex-Situ Characterization
Benjamin Greenberg (American Society for Engineering Education); James Wollmershauser, Boris Feygelson (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory)

Particle atomic layer deposition (pALD) is an increasingly popular technique for mass production of core/shell nanoparticles (NPs). In a typical pALD process, NP powders are agitated in a fluidized bed or rotary reactor, and conformal coating of the entire powder surface—often > 100 m2 in lab-scale reactors—is attempted via prolonged precursor exposures and purges. Over the past 2+ decades there have been many reports of highly encouraging results, including TEM images of NPs individually encapsulated by shells of uniform thickness. Nevertheless, several fundamental questions about pALD mechanisms and behavior remain challenging to answer. For example, how does the pALD growth per cycle (GPC) deviate from the corresponding ALD GPC on a flat substrate, and why? Or more importantly, what conditions are required to maximize the fraction of powder that attains an ideal core/shell structure (individual NP encapsulation) rather than a coated-agglomerate structure in which cores are glued together? In this work, using a commercial rotary pALD reactor to coat various NPs with oxide shells, we employ a wide array of characterization techniques to shed light on these issues and inform process optimization. In situ, we experiment with relatively uncommon techniques such as high-speed video analysis and pyrometry of the agitated NP powder, as well as conventional techniques such as mass spectrometry (RGA). High-speed videos in particular reveal aspects of the process often undiscussed (and sometimes difficult to convey) in the pALD literature, including changes in the powder motion as surface chemistry evolves. Ex situ, we characterize the coated NPs via TEM, XRD, SAXS, XPS, and N2-adsorption surface area measurements (BET method).

2:40 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-4 Impact of Medium Energy Ions on HfO2 Nucleation Mechanisms on Si, SiO2,TiN Substrates in PEALD Processes Investigated by In situ Ellipsometry, Optical Emission Spectroscopy, AFM and XPS Analyses
Marceline Bonvalot, Samia belahcen, Ahmad Bsiesy, Christophe Vallée (LTM, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA-LETI, France)
Area Selective Deposition (ASD) processes have recently attracted an increasing technological interest, as a very promising route for the development of bottom-up fabrication processes as an alternative to increasingly expensive thin layer patterning processes in advanced nanoscale devices. However, to achieve a high quality selective deposition, a deep understanding of the very initial stages of growth in Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) processes is needed. This so-called nucleation step is strongly dependent upon growth conditions in ALD processes, namely pressure and temperature, but also on precursor types and susbtrate surfaces on which growth is carried out.

In this work, we have investigated the nucleation mechanism of HfO2 with TEMAH precursor by plasma-enhanced ALD carried out in an Oxford FlexAL tool. This tool is equipped with an Atomic Layer Etching (ALE) system from Oxford Instruments, which consists of a continuous tunable bias power set-up applied in the back face of the chuck. When turned on during the plasma step of the PE-ALD cycle, medium energy ions (0 - 100 W) can be extracted from the inductive plasma source toward the sample surface. They may in turn contribute physically and chemically to the growth mechanism, and thus, a careful adjustment of this bias power allows a tuning of the physical properties of the layer under growth.

The nucleation behavior of HfO2 on 3 types of substrates (H-terminated Si, SiO2 and TiN) has been followed under applied bias power values between 0 and 100 W, by in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry assisted by Optical Emission Spectroscopy for the identification of plasma active species and desorbed by-products. The samples have then been analysed by means of Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). Insights into Hf peak intensities allow an estimate of the coverage of HfO2 nuclei formed in the very first (typically 5) cycles of the PE-ALD process. A discussion will be presented on the role of medium energy ions in the observed nucleation mechanism, in view of potential applications to the development of ASD processes.

3:00 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-5 Controlling the Nucleation of CVD Cobalt Films on SiO2 : Combining an Amido-based Nucleation Promotor with an Amine-based Growth Inhibitor to Afford Atomically-smooth Surfaces
Zhejun Zhang, Gregory Girolami, John Abelson (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Cobalt films are of interest for the back-end metallization and transistor contact in microelectronics because cobalt has a greater electromigration resistance and a lower diffusion rate in dielectrics compared with copper. However, few-nanometer thick Co films deposited by CVD on dielectrics are usually non-continuous – they consist of islands with pinholes and significant roughness – which renders them unsuitable for nanoscale device fabrication. A nucleation layer, such as TiN, can be pre-deposited to improve the area density of Co nuclei; this approach eliminates the problem of islanding, but it subtracts cross-sectional area from the plug or line, thus increasing the electrical resistance.

Here, we solve the Co nucleation problem in CVD using a two-pronged approach. First we expose the SiO2 surface to a tetrakis(dimethylamido)(transition metal) precursor at low temperature. This affords a self-limiting, submonolayer coverage of an intermediate, similar to the behavior of such molecules in ALD processes. The adsorbate layer then enhances the nucleation of cobalt from the Co2(CO)8 precursor, such that a large area density of nanoscale islands forms with essentially no nucleation delay. Using this approach, the rms surface roughness for a 1.5-nm-thick Co film decreases from 2.5 to 1.0 nm.

Second, we further improve the surface morphology by adding a co-flow of ammonia together with the carbonyl precursor; this serves as a growth inhibitor that reduces the steady-state growth rate of Co films by 50 %. The presence of the inhibitor does not alter the nucleation rate, however, the rms roughness of a 1.5-nm-thick film is further reduced to only 0.4 nm. We suggest that the roughness is due to a better valley-filling at low precursor reaction probability, consistent with the literature. In summary, our approach enables the use of CVD to afford excellent Co films for nanofabrication.

3:20 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-6 Plasma-assisted Atomic Layer Epitaxy of Indium Aluminum Nitride Studied Using in situ Grazing Incidence Small-angle X-ray Scattering
Jeffrey M. Woodward (ASEE (residing at US Naval Research Laboratory)); Samantha G. Rosenberg (American Society for Engineering Education (residing at US Naval Research Laboratory)); Scooter Johnson, Neeraj Nepal (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory); Zachary R. Robinson (SUNY Brockport); Karl Ludwig (Boston University); Charles Eddy (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory)

Indium aluminum nitride (InAlN) is an attractive material for power electronic applications. However, conventional methods of epitaxial growth of InAlN are challenged by a large miscibility gap and the significant differences in optimal growth conditions for the constituent aluminum nitride (AlN) and indium nitride (InN) binary compounds. Despite these challenges, the epitaxial growth of InAlN alloys throughout the entire compositional range has been demonstrated using plasma-assisted atomic layer epitaxy (ALEp)1, a variant of atomic layer deposition in which relatively higher temperatures are utilized. In the ALEp growth of InAlN, the desired alloy compositions are achieved by forming ultra-short period superlattices of alternating InN and AlN layers, referred to as digital alloys (DA). In order to further advance these empirical efforts, significant research is needed to better understand the nucleation and growth kinetics of ALEp DA growth. To this end, we employ in situ grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) for the real-time study of the evolving ternary InAlN surfaces as has been done previously for binary InN2 and AlN3.

Here we present in situ GISAXS studies of ALEp growth of InN, AlN, and a range of InAlN DAs on GaN (0001) substrates, which were performed at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s NSLS-II using a custom reactor. The InAlN DAs studied include In0.19Al0.81N (3 AlN cycles and 2 InN cycles per supercycle), In0.5Al0.5N (1 AlN cycle and 3 InN cycles per supercycle), In0.64Al0.36N (1 AlN cycle and 5 InN cycles per supercycle) and In0.83Al0.17N (1 AlN cycle and 14 InN cycles per supercycle). Preliminary analysis of the data suggests that while the pure InN and AlN grew in 3D and 2D modes, respectively, the InAlN growth mode did not follow a simple trend as the nominal composition was tuned from InN to AlN. Instead, select compositions (50% and 83% In) exhibited predominantly 3D growth, while others (19% and 64% In) exhibited 2D growth. We also present complementary ALEp growth studies using a commercial Ultratech/Cambridge Nano Tech Fiji 200 and ex situ characterization methods, including high resolution X-ray diffraction, X-ray reflectivity, and atomic force microscopy.

1 N. Nepal, V.R. Anderson, J.K. Hite, and C.R. Eddy, Thin Solid Films 589, 47 (2015)

2 J.M. Woodward, S.G. Rosenberg, A.C. Kozen, N. Nepal, S.D. Johnson, C. Wagenbach, A.H. Rowley, Z.R. Robinson, H. Joress, K.F. Ludwig Jr, C.R. Eddy Jr, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 37, 030901 (2019)

3 V.R. Anderson, N. Nepal, S.D. Johnson, Z.R. Robinson, A. Nath, A.C. Kozen, S.B. Qadri, A. DeMasi, J.K. Hite, K.F. Ludwig, and C.R. Eddy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 35, 031508 (2017)

View Supplemental Document (pdf)
3:40 PM BREAK
4:00 PM Invited TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-8 Real-time Monitoring of the Surface Chemistry of Atomic Layer Deposition by Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Joachim Schnadt, Payam Shayesteh (Lund University, Sweden); Roman Tsyshevskiy (University of Maryland); Gallet Jean-Jacques, Fabrice Bournel (Sorbonne Université, France); Rainer Timm (Lund University, Sweden); Ashley R. Head (Brookhaven National Laboratory); Giulio D'Acunto, Foqia Rehman, Shilpi Chaudhary (Lund University, Sweden); Rocío Sánchez-de-Armas (Uppsala University, Sweden); François Rochet (Sorbonne Université, France); Barbara Brena (Uppsala University, Sweden); Anders Mikkelsen, Samuli Urpelainen, Andrea Troian, Sofie Yngman, Jan Knudsen (Lund University, Sweden)
Atomic layer deposition (ALD) and chemical vapour deposition (CVD) are very important methods that enable a highly controlled growth of thin films [1]. The surface chemis­try of the underlying processes remains, however, little understood. While idealised reac­tion mechanisms have been developed, they represent postulates rather than models based on the factual identification of surface species and kinetics [2]. New in situ and operando methods offer the prospect of gaining a much more thorough understanding of the involved molecular and atomic surface processes and (dynamic) structures, which, in turn, means that a much better knowledge basis can be achieved for the future improvement of materials and growth recipes (see, e.g. [3,4]). One such operando method, which can be applied to the investigation of ALD and CVD, is synchrotron-based ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS). While conventional x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is limited to vacuum pressures of 10-5 mbar and below, APXPS can be carried out at realistic pressure. Today, most APXPS machines can operate at pressures up to the 10 mbar regime, which is an ideal match to the pressure regime used in standard ALD reactors.

Here, I will report on our recent efforts to apply density functional theory (DFT)-assisted synchrotron-based APXPS to the ALD/CVD of oxides (TiO2, SiO2, and HfO2) on semiconductor (InAs and Si) and oxide surfaces (TiO2, RuO2) [3-5]. I will show that APXPS allows the identification of the surface species occurring during thin film growth and the real-time monitoring of their evolution with a time resolution of down into the millisecond regime. Here, DFT is an important tool for pinpointing the nature of the chemical species and for providing deeper insight in the surface chemical processes. I will also report on our efforts to further improve instrumentation with the goal of achieving a much closer match of the APXPS sample environment with the geometries used in conventional ALD reactors. The development will also open for the use of a wider range of precursors and growth protocols.

[1] V. Miikkulainen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 113 (2013) 021301.

[2] F. Zaera, Coord. Chem. Rev. 257 (2013) 3177.

[3] B. A. Sperling et al. Appl. Spectrosc. 67 (2013) 1003.

[4] K. Devloo-Casier et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 32 (2014) 010801.

[3] S. Chaudhary et al. , J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 19149.

[4] A. R. Head et al. , J. Phys. Chem. C 120 (2016) 243.

[5] R. Timm et al., Nature Commun. 9 (2018) 412.

4:40 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-10 Kinetics during TMA-H2O ALD: The Possible Role of Cooperative Surface Reactions
Brent Sperling, Berc Kalanyan, James Maslar (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST))

Until recently, the CH3 groups produced by surface reactions of trimethylaluminum (TMA) during atomic layer deposition were widely believed to always be highly reactive toward H2O, but in situ measurements have shown this is not the case below about 200 °C.[1] At these temperatures, some CH3 groups react slowly, and a significant amount persists from cycle to cycle under typical growth conditions. Interestingly, these persistent CH3 groups are not incorporated as carbon impurities. We have observed these CH3 groups using in situ reflection infrared spectroscopy and have confirmed low carbon concentrations in our films using ex situ XPS. Furthermore, we have measured the kinetics of the reaction with H2O and have found them to be well-described by a double-exponential decay function. A simple Monte Carlo simulation that incorporates cooperative effects by clustered surface reactants (as suggested by DFT calculations[2]) reveals that a double-exponential decay of coverage can result even when only one species of reactant is present. Furthermore, the short-range distributions of coverage that result in the simulation differ from purely random ones. This difference implies that measurements sensitive to dipole-dipole interactions when combined with an independent measurement of surface coverage could be used to confirm or disprove the cooperative reaction model.

[1] V. Vandalon and W. M. M. Kessels, J. Vac. Sci. Techol. A35 (2017) 05C313

[2] M. Shirazi and S. D. Elliott, Nanoscale7 (2015) 6311.

5:00 PM TF+2D+AP+EL+SS-MoA-11 Atomic Layer Deposition of Metal Sulfides: Growth and Surface Chemistry
Xinwei Wang (Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, China)

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of metal sulfides has recently aroused great interest, and many new sulfide ALD processes have emerged during the past several years. Surface chemistry plays a key role in ALD, but it remains yet to be investigated for many recently developed sulfide ALD processes. In this representation, I will report our study on the growth and surface chemistry of the ALD of nickel, iron, and cobalt sulfides, using various in situ characterization techniques of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low-energy ion scattering (LEIS), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), and quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS). For instance, nickel sulfide (NiS) can be deposited from a Ni amidinate precursor (Ni(amd)2) and H2S by ALD (Chem. Mater. (2016) 28, 1155), but the surface chemistry of this process is found to deviate from the conventional ligand-exchange ALD scheme, and a formation of a nonvolatile acid-base complex from acidic surface sulfhydryl and basic amidine is suggested during the H2S half-cycle (J. Phys. Chem. C (2018) 122, 21514). The initial ALD growth of NiS on a SiOx surface is also intriguing, as the initial growth mechanism is found to be rather different from that in the later steady film growth. In the initial ALD cycles, the XPS results show a drastic cyclic variation of the signals for the Ni−O bonds, with prominently observable Ni−O signals after each Ni(amd)2 dose but almost negligible after the subsequent H2S dose. These results suggest that the Ni−O bonds are first formed on the surface in the Ni(amd)2 half-cycles and then mostly converted to NiS in the following H2S half-cycles. To describe this initial ALD growth process, a reaction-agglomeration mechanistic scheme is proposed (Chem. Mater. (2019) 31, 445). Surface thermolysis study of the Ni amidinate precursor further reveals the temperature-dependent behavior of the film growth.

Session Abstract Book
(312KB, Apr 26, 2020)
Time Period MoA Sessions | Abstract Timeline | Topic TF Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | AVS 66 Schedule