AVS2012 Session BP+AS-SuA: Biomaterials Plenary - Bioimaging: In Vacuo, In Vitro, In Vivo
Time Period SuA Sessions | Abstract Timeline | Topic BP Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | AVS2012 Schedule
Start | Invited? | Item |
---|---|---|
4:00 PM | Invited |
BP+AS-SuA-1 NanoBio Imaging for New Biomedical Applications
DaeWon Moon (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) Surface and interface analysis techniques have been mainly developed to meet the demands on atomic scale characterization from semiconductor industries. KRISS has been trying to meet the surface and interface analysis challenges from semiconductor industries and furthermore to extend the application scope to biomedical areas. In this presentation, I’d like to report our recent activities of nanobio imaging for new biomedical applications such as 1) Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) for atherosclerotic plaque imaging 2) Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) for mass imaging of collagen fibrils, atherosclerotic plaques, and cancer tissues and 3) Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging Ellipsometry for cell adhesion, migration, and infiltration dynamics for HUVEC, CASMC, and T cells 4) TOF-medium energy ion scattering spectroscopy (TOF-MEIS) for nanothin films and nanoparticles such as CdSe/ZnS quantum dots and calcium hydroxyapatite nano-size biominerals. Future challenges of nanobio imaging for biomedical applications will be discussed. |
4:40 PM | Invited |
BP+AS-SuA-3 3-D View into Cells by X-ray Nano-Tomography
Gerd Schneider, P. Guttmann, S. Werner, K. Henzler, S. Rehbein (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Germany) X-ray imaging offers a new 3-D view into cells. With its ability to penetrate whole hydrated cells it is ideally suited for pairing fluorescence light microscopy and nanoscale X-ray tomography. The HZB TXM at the undulator U41 provides a spectral resolution of 10.000 and a spatial resolution of 11 nm. For high resolution tomography, we adopted a tilt stage originally developed for electron tomography. The stage is able to tilt samples up to ± 80°. Such a large tilt of flat sample holders is impossible with TXM at bending magnet sources because they require a monochromator pinhole to be positioned close to the specimen. In our TXM, the holder geometry is no longer restricted to glass tubes. References 1. S. Rehbein, S. Heim, P. Guttmann, S. Werner, G. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (2009) 110801 2. G. Schneider, P. Guttmann, S. Heim, S. Rehbein, F. Mueller, K. Nagashima, J.B. Heymann, W.G. Müller, J.G. McNally, Nature Methods 7 (2010), 985-987 3. P. Guttmann, C. Bittencourt, S. Rehbein, P. Umek, X. Ke, G. Van Tendeloo, C. P. Ewels and G. Schneider, Nature Photonics 6 (2012), 25-29 4. G. Schneider, P. Guttmann, S. Rehbein, S. Werner, R. Follath, J. Struct. Biol. 177 (2012), 212-223 |
5:20 PM | Invited |
BP+AS-SuA-5 Nanoscopy with Focused Light
Stefan Hell (Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Germany) In STED microscopy1, fluorescent features are switched off by the STED beam, which confines the fluorophores to the ground state everywhere in the focal region except at a subdiffraction area of extent. In RESOLFT microscopy,2,3 the principles of STED have been expanded to fluorescence on-off-switching at low intensities I, by resorting to molecular switching mechanisms that entail low switching thresholds Is. An Is lower by many orders of magnitude is provided by reversibly switching the fluorophore to a long-lived dark (triplet) state2 or between a long-lived ‘fluorescence activated’ and ‘deactivated’ state.2,5 These alternative switching mechanisms entail an Is that is several orders of magnitude lower than in STED. In imaging applications, STED/RESOLFT enables fast recordings and the application to living cells, tissues, and even living animals.6,7 Starting from the basic principles of nanoscopy we will discuss recent developments8,9 with particular attention to RESOLFT and the recent nanoscale imaging of the brain of living mice7 by STED. 1 Hell, S. W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated-emission - stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy, 780-782, doi:10.1364/OL.19.000780 (1994). 2 Hell, S. W. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy, 1347-1355 (2003). 3 Hell, S. W., Jakobs, S. & Kastrup, L. Imaging and writing at the nanoscale with focused visible light through saturable optical transitions, 859-860 (2003). 4 Hell, S. W. Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy, 1153-1158 (2007). 5 Hofmann, M., Eggeling, C., Jakobs, S. & Hell, S. W. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins, 17565-17569 (2005). 6 Rankin, B. R. Nanoscopy in a Living Multicellular Organism Expressing GFP, L63 - L65 (2011). 7 Berning, S., Willig, K. I., Steffens, H., Dibaj, P. & Hell, S. W. Nanoscopy in a Living Mouse Brain, 551 (2012). 8 Grotjohann, T. Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP, 204-208 (2011). 9 Brakemann, T. A reversibly photoswitchable GFP-like protein with fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching, 942-947 (2011). |